Jump to content
Gerard Butler GALS

3/12 - What made '300' a hit?


Perrin
 Share

Recommended Posts

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/...viewed-homepage

What made '300' a hit?

A perfect storm of factors -- some man-made, some beyond studio control -- made the action film a box office smash.

By Deborah Netburn, Times Staff Writer

March 13, 2007

The box office gurus expected "300" to do well over the weekend, but not $70 million well -- a record for a movie opening in March.

"This was way beyond everyone's expectations," said Brandon Gray, who founded the website Box Office Mojo. "We're all trying to figure out how this movie became a phenomenon."

There was every reason for "300" to flop -- no big-name stars (although Gerard Butler is now decidedly on the map), an R rating, a historical story and, before the weekend, Warner Brothers tracking found that there was only 68% public awareness of the film.

So how did "300" become the biggest film ever to open in March, set the record for best opening weekend for IMAX screens, and earn the third-biggest opening for an R-rated film? The answer lies in a perfect storm of factors -- some man-made, some entirely beyond the control of Warner Brothers' savvy marketing department.

The consensus seems to be that this movie was a success because of its specific and arresting visuals. "Warner Brothers had this with the 'Matrix' in 1999," said Gray. "That was another movie that was sold on its unique look."

Before San Diego Comic-Con last year, "300" wasn't on anybody's radar. "Before we went we all made a list of which panels we were most excited for and nobody said '300,'" said Berge Garabedian who runs the fanboy website Joblo.

But he and his staff dutifully attended a panel on "300" along with several hundred other "early adapters." They listened as Zack Snyder, Gerard Butler and some special effects guys spoke about the film. Then they saw some clips.

"Each and every person in that room was blown away," said Garabedian. "It was slow motion, it was so visual, it wasn't real. When it was over somebody actually asked them to show the clips again, and I've never seen that happen at a panel before."

When Garabedian returned from Comic-Con he began hyping the movie on his site and he wasn't the only one. "Everybody was talking about it," he said.

Fanboy buzz is not enough to sell a film -- "Snakes on a Plane," anyone? -- but Garabedian points out that while the online community was obsessively talking about "Snakes" they were ultimately making fun of it. The people who were driving the chatter around "300" were genuinely excited about the film, especially the way it looked. And after Comic-Con, Warner Bros. marketing department made sure that the fanboys got the usual dribs and drabs of movie art and trailers just to keep their excitement up.

The marketing folks also took full advantage of MySpace. There was of course the requisite MySpace page for the film (now standard for all movies) -- featuring a ferocious looking muscle man in a metal helmet plus tons of video clips, wallpapers and links to the film's official website. But the stroke of genius came when the studio sponsored a feature upgrade to the site that told users they could store 300 photos on their profile thanks to the movie "300." (Previously the limit had been 12). That started Jan. 2 and was incredibly popular with teens. The result was billions of ad impressions and 8 million viewings of the trailer. Is it any wonder that the 52% of the people who saw "300" were under 25?

There are also mundane reasons "300" might have done well. A generally warm weekend across the country encouraged people to get out of the house and brave long lines, and no other major film was released against "300," so it didn't have much competition. And while the critics have been lukewarm on the film -- faulting it for poor dialogue and a thin story -- nobody has said anything negative about the visuals. And to a generation of kids who have grown up with the lush worlds of video games, "300" was a familiar visual masterpiece.

"I honestly think the film's success is based on the visuals," said Garabedian. "People are not coming out of the movie saying it's the best movie they ever saw, but they are completely blown away by the visuals."

In fact, "300" became so successful that kids who define themselves by their underground tastes -- the target market for this film -- decided the movie is too mainstream. Although originally psyched to see "300," 20-year-old Atlanta native Justin Scharf decided it had gotten too mainstream. "The biggest theater in Atlanta had three midnight screenings on Thursday night and they were all sold out," he said. "And after getting bombarded with advertising on MySpace I lost interest in it before I saw it," he said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree. I don't think the visuals are the main factor for this film's explosion in the box office. I think it's the story too... simple but timeless. Good verses bad, arses getting kicked and people fighting and dying for their principals.

I think to overlook Gerard's Leonidas is truly ridiculous at this point, when he is being hailed by critics and moviegoers for his 3 dimensional and powerful performance in this role.

These peeps are ticking me off!

Swannie

Edited by Swansong
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do think the visuals had a LOT to do with the success.

And I think the market analyst gurus at WB are amazing. The myspace thing, then the early TV trailers, and finally (though this article doesn't mention it, of course), I think that WB is one of the first to effectively pimp the ready-made fanbases. And while I do think that the GB fans were a large and strategic part (dude, 10,000 enthused women make for a helluva lot of word-of-mouth), I think they also played to the Frank Miller and Zach Snyder fans. (And maybe the other actors', who knows...). I don't know if this is going to be a trend that is repeated, but I think by welcoming, and wisely using, the fans by distributing info and pics and trailers was a wise, wise move.

If more companies realize the goldmine that this sort of marketing is, then other movies with the gorgeous cinematography and acting talent that 300 had can make more at the box office.

Jen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest greyeyegoddess

They will never get it until they hit the right mark...the fans...the fans of Gerry, Frank, David, Zack, Rodrigo, fans of comics and video games....that's why you have such a mixed group of people interested. No one really knew the story, except those who saw the movie at special screenings, but that doesn't always make it to a box office smash.

Ideally, anything to do with ancient history is a snore....I like it, but most people don't, unless you account for something like the show "Rome".

People were curious too. The ads looked cool to them, but those aren't the ones who buy their tickets in advanced, which means they probably had to be turned away at night and IMAX showings.

WB did good...keep up the good work.

~alice

:music:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that the advertising and marketing on this went a LONG way to the success, but in the end, if the movie was bad they could advertise until they were blue in the face and it would mean nothing.

The VISUALS ARE STUNNING and I think that does help a lot as well, plus the fight scenes, I was telling someone that there was a scene in Rome that was more brutal than 300, in fact it didn't touch 300, but the choreography of the battles in 300 were just so fluid it made them seem well..easier to take.

Add in the stellar acting, particularly by one Mr. Butler, and you have a hit.

I do like the fact that they included that he is NOW ON THE MAP..but from my point of view, he shoulda been there the whole time.

Edited by moonglow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fanboys and the critics won't notice the acting for the most part, they will notice the visuals. Women more generally will notice the acting, the heart and the love story behind the battles. That is one of the things I don't believe anyone counted on really. WB was brilliant for marketing directly to fan bases because it brought people into the theater who might have stayed away in droves otherwise. I am impressed by the visuals, but the visuals wouldn't drive me to see it repeatedly - I go back to see the humor and self-assured cockiness of Leonidas, the love he has for his Queen, her strength of character, and to see him utter his last words again and again. That scene alone will send me back to the theater (and the abs and codpieces are just a bonus, really they are).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...